↓ Skip to main content

Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cyclodestructive procedures for refractory glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012223.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica F Chen, Carole H Kim, Anne L Coleman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Unspecified 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Unspecified 7 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,462,376
of 13,538,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,228
of 10,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,507
of 253,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,538,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.