You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Survival of Late Pleistocene Hunter-Gatherer Ancestry in the Iberian Peninsula
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vanessa Villalba-Mouco, Marieke S. van de Loosdrecht, Cosimo Posth, Rafael Mora, Jorge Martínez-Moreno, Manuel Rojo-Guerra, Domingo C. Salazar-García, José I. Royo-Guillén, Michael Kunst, Hélène Rougier, Isabelle Crevecoeur, Héctor Arcusa-Magallón, Cristina Tejedor-Rodríguez, Iñigo García-Martínez de Lagrán, Rafael Garrido-Pena, Kurt W. Alt, Choongwon Jeong, Stephan Schiffels, Pilar Utrilla, Johannes Krause, Wolfgang Haak |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 16% |
Spain | 6 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 7% |
Curaçao | 2 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Greece | 1 | 2% |
Estonia | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 22 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 31 | 69% |
Scientists | 9 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 13% |
Unknown | 35 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 17% |
Arts and Humanities | 25 | 16% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 11% |
Unknown | 44 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#167,891
of 24,495,755 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#853
of 14,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,554
of 356,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#18
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,495,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.