You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Climate-Altered Wetlands Challenge Waterbird Use and Migratory Connectivity in Arid Landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-41135-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan M. Haig, Sean P. Murphy, John H. Matthews, Ivan Arismendi, Mohammad Safeeq |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 19% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#420,524
of 24,501,737 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,689
of 133,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,854
of 357,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#172
of 4,339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,501,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.