↓ Skip to main content

Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Institutional Costs and Physician Burden

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
58 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public Reporting of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes Institutional Costs and Physician Burden
Published in
JACC, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rishi K Wadhera, Colin W O'Brien, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Kalon K L Ho, Duane S Pinto, Frederic S Resnic, Pinak B Shah, Robert W Yeh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#996,179
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,470
of 16,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,310
of 365,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#98
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.