You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are bottom-up approaches good for promoting social–ecological fit in urban landscapes?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01163-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johan P. Enqvist, Maria Tengö, Örjan Bodin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,880,139
of 25,974,666 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#533
of 1,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,762
of 368,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,974,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.