You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Cells Integrate Complex Stimuli: The Effect of Feedback from Phosphoinositides and Cell Shape on Cell Polarization and Motility
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002402 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Athanasius F. M. Marée, Verônica A. Grieneisen, Leah Edelstein-Keshet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 159 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 34% |
| Researcher | 46 | 26% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 34% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 11% |
| Engineering | 16 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,092,197
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,491
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,490
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#62
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.