The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Towards an Understanding of Tinnitus Heterogeneity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher R. Cederroth, Silvano Gallus, Deborah A. Hall, Tobias Kleinjung, Berthold Langguth, Antonello Maruotti, Martin Meyer, Arnaud Norena, Thomas Probst, Rüdiger Pryss, Grant Searchfield, Giriraj Shekhawat, Myra Spiliopoulou, Sven Vanneste, Winfried Schlee |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,211,243
of 25,985,060 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,298
of 5,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,181
of 367,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#40
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,985,060 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.