You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Foliar-feeding insects acquire microbiomes from the soil rather than the host plant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09284-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Emilia Hannula, Feng Zhu, Robin Heinen, T. Martijn Bezemer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 15% |
| Australia | 5 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 54% |
| Scientists | 30 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 18% |
| Researcher | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 72 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 84 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#512,245
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#8,672
of 58,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,562
of 366,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#218
of 1,420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.