↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of the Poly-T Variant in the TOMM40 Gene in Diverse Populations

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of the Poly-T Variant in the TOMM40 Gene in Diverse Populations
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030994
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colton Linnertz, Ann M. Saunders, Michael W. Lutz, Donna M. Crenshaw, Iris Grossman, Daniel K. Burns, Keith E. Whitfield, Michael A. Hauser, Jeanette J. McCarthy, Megan Ulmer, Rand Allingham, Kathleen A. Welsh-Bohmer, Allen D. Roses, Ornit Chiba-Falek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,282,781
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,174
of 194,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,750
of 155,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#594
of 3,557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.