↓ Skip to main content

International Network for Comparison of HIV Neutralization Assays: The NeutNet Report

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International Network for Comparison of HIV Neutralization Assays: The NeutNet Report
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0004505
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Maria Fenyö, Alan Heath, Stefania Dispinseri, Harvey Holmes, Paolo Lusso, Susan Zolla-Pazner, Helen Donners, Leo Heyndrickx, Jose Alcami, Vera Bongertz, Christian Jassoy, Mauro Malnati, David Montefiori, Christiane Moog, Lynn Morris, Saladin Osmanov, Victoria Polonis, Quentin Sattentau, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Ruengpung Sutthent, Terri Wrin, Gabriella Scarlatti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2012.
All research outputs
#4,710,483
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,478
of 194,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,110
of 94,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#199
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.