↓ Skip to main content

China’s long march at sea: explaining Beijing’s South China Sea strategy, 2009–2016

Overview of attention for article published in The Pacific Review, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 272)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
China’s long march at sea: explaining Beijing’s South China Sea strategy, 2009–2016
Published in
The Pacific Review, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/09512748.2019.1587497
Authors

Feng Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#580,683
of 13,813,295 outputs
Outputs from The Pacific Review
#11
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,358
of 254,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Pacific Review
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,813,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them