You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Proposed U.S. regulation of gene-edited food animals is not fit for purpose
|
---|---|
Published in |
npj Science of Food, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41538-019-0035-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alison L. Van Eenennaam, Kevin D. Wells, James D. Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 41% |
Comoros | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 64% |
Scientists | 10 | 26% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 20% |
Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#237,840
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from npj Science of Food
#14
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,155
of 364,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Science of Food
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them