You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of depression prevalence estimates in meta-analyses based on screening tools and rating scales versus diagnostic interviews: a meta-research review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1297-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brooke Levis, Xin Wei Yan, Chen He, Ying Sun, Andrea Benedetti, Brett D. Thombs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,358,590
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,034
of 4,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,150
of 366,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#41
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.