You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A paired-end sequencing strategy to map the complex landscape of transcription initiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.1464 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ting Ni, David L Corcoran, Elizabeth A Rach, Shen Song, Eric P Spana, Yuan Gao, Uwe Ohler, Jun Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 249 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 90 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 179 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,431,007
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,447
of 4,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,456
of 94,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.