You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Second Screening: Building Social Media Social Capital through Dual Screen Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Communication Research, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/hcr/hqz004 |
| Authors |
Brigitte Huber, Homero Gil de Zúñiga, Trevor Diehl, James Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Austria | 1 | 11% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 31% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,183,460
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Human Communication Research
#233
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,371
of 365,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Communication Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.