↓ Skip to main content

Defining the Limits of Spectrally Based Bathymetric Mapping on a Large River

Overview of attention for article published in Remote Sensing, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Defining the Limits of Spectrally Based Bathymetric Mapping on a Large River
Published in
Remote Sensing, March 2019
DOI 10.3390/rs11060665
Authors

Carl Legleiter, Ryan Fosness

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 50%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#10,023,001
of 13,110,606 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#2,466
of 4,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,073
of 251,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#60
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,110,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.