↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009037.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shanshan Han, Caroline A Crowther, Philippa Middleton

Abstract

Pregnancy hyperglycaemia without meeting gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnostic criteria affects a significant proportion of pregnant women each year. It is associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Although intensive management for women with GDM has been proven beneficial for women and their babies, there is little known about the effects of treating women with hyperglycaemia who do not meet diagnostic criteria for GDM and type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 23%
Unspecified 26 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Other 62 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 52%
Unspecified 36 18%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 23 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,403,285
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,724
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,355
of 217,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#301
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.