↓ Skip to main content

Interest Groups on the Inside: The Governance of Public Pension Funds

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives on Politics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Interest Groups on the Inside: The Governance of Public Pension Funds
Published in
Perspectives on Politics, March 2019
DOI 10.1017/s1537592718003468
Authors

Sarah F. Anzia, Terry M. Moe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,950,599
of 13,118,812 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives on Politics
#247
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,880
of 251,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives on Politics
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,118,812 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.