↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Improve HIV Testing and Receipt of Results: Economic Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Improve HIV Testing and Receipt of Results: Economic Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11606-010-1265-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian D. Sanders, Henry D. Anaya, Steven Asch, Tuyen Hoang, Joya F. Golden, Ahmed M. Bayoumi, Douglas K. Owens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Peru 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 30%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 10%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 15 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,640,130
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,985
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,001
of 96,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#17
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.