↓ Skip to main content

A virtual “field test” of forest management carbon offset protocols: the influence of accounting

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A virtual “field test” of forest management carbon offset protocols: the influence of accounting
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11027-009-9190-9
Authors

Christopher S. Galik, Megan L. Mobley, Daniel deB. Richter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 8%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#457
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,068
of 110,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.