↓ Skip to main content

Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photoinhibition and Abiotic Stress: Does it Make Any Difference the Fact to Be a C3 or C4 Species?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
239 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Photoinhibition and Abiotic Stress: Does it Make Any Difference the Fact to Be a C3 or C4 Species?
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2019.00174
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucia Guidi, Ermes Lo Piccolo, Marco Landi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 137 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 32%
Environmental Science 29 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 8%
Unspecified 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 150 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,748,160
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,523
of 24,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,207
of 461,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#137
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,965 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.