↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00167-009-0952-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milford H. Marchant, S. Clifton Willimon, Emily Vinson, Ricardo Pietrobon, William E. Garrett, Laurence D. Higgins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 53%
Engineering 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,184,175
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#478
of 2,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,544
of 165,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.