↓ Skip to main content

External counterpulsation for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
External counterpulsation for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009264.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sen Lin, Ming Liu, Bo Wu, Zilong Hao, Jie Yang, Wendan Tao

Abstract

External counterpulsation (ECP) may improve cerebral blood flow, and it has been proposed as a potential therapy for patients with ischaemic stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Unspecified 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Other 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 58%
Unspecified 11 23%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,053,269
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,225
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,910
of 217,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#270
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.