↓ Skip to main content

Psychophysiology of False Memories in a Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm with Visual Scenes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychophysiology of False Memories in a Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm with Visual Scenes
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Baioui, Wolfgang Ambach, Bertram Walter, Dieter Vaitl

Abstract

Remembering something that has not in fact been experienced is commonly referred to as false memory. The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is a well-elaborated approach to this phenomenon. This study attempts to investigate the peripheral physiology of false memories induced in a visual DRM paradigm. The main research question is whether false recognition is different from true recognition in terms of accompanying physiological responses.Sixty subjects participated in the experiment, which included a study phase with visual scenes each showing a group of interrelated items in social contexts. Subjects were divided into an experimental group undergoing a classical DRM design and a control group without DRM manipulation. The control group was implemented in order to statistically control for possible biases produced by memorability differences between stimulus types. After a short retention interval, a pictorial recognition phase was conducted in the manner of a Concealed Information Test. Simultaneous recordings of electrodermal activity, respiration line length, phasic heart rate, and finger pulse waveform length were used. Results yielded a significant Group by Item Type interaction, showing that true recognition is accompanied by greater electrodermal activity than false recognition.Results are discussed in the light of Sokolov's Orienting Reflex, the Preliminary Process Theory and the Concealed Information Test. Implications and restrictions of the introduced design features are critically discussed. This study demonstrates the applicability of measures of peripheral physiology to the field of false memory research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,156,138
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#172,665
of 193,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,406
of 245,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,995
of 3,288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.