You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A novel survival model of cardioplegic arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass in rats: a methodology paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-3-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fellery de Lange, Kenji Yoshitani, Mihai V Podgoreanu, Hilary P Grocott, G Burkhard Mackensen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 64% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,473,822
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#148
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,066
of 83,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them