You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Long-Distance Signals Are Required for Morphogenesis of the Regenerating Xenopus Tadpole Tail, as Shown by Femtosecond-Laser Ablation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024953 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica P. Mondia, Michael Levin, Fiorenzo G. Omenetto, Ryan D. Orendorff, Mary Rose Branch, Dany Spencer Adams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2022.
All research outputs
#20,662,403
of 25,390,970 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#180,625
of 220,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,251
of 130,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,065
of 2,534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,970 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.