↓ Skip to main content

A Chemical Screen Probing the Relationship between Mitochondrial Content and Cell Size

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Chemical Screen Probing the Relationship between Mitochondrial Content and Cell Size
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033755
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshimori Kitami, David J. Logan, Joseph Negri, Thomas Hasaka, Nicola J. Tolliday, Anne E. Carpenter, Bruce M. Spiegelman, Vamsi K. Mootha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 99 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 32%
Researcher 36 32%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Student > Master 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,166,960
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,516
of 197,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,413
of 161,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#467
of 3,700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.