↓ Skip to main content

Understanding implementation and usefulness of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for melanoma in English primary care: a qualitative investigation

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Understanding implementation and usefulness of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for melanoma in English primary care: a qualitative investigation
Published in
BJGP Open, March 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101635
Authors

Merel M Pannebakker, Katie Mills, Margaret Johnson, Jon D Emery, Fiona M Walter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Social Sciences 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,805,996
of 13,538,683 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#114
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,249
of 254,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,538,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.