↓ Skip to main content

Linking Scottish vital event records using family groups

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Linking Scottish vital event records using family groups
Published in
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/01615440.2019.1571466
Authors

Özgür Akgün, Alan Dearle, Graham Kirby, Eilidh Garrett, Tom Dalton, Peter Christen, Chris Dibben, Lee Williamson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,233,609
of 13,133,981 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#75
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,123
of 251,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,133,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them