You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Globally important islands where eradicating invasive mammals will benefit highly threatened vertebrates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0212128 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick D Holmes, Dena R Spatz, Steffen Oppel, Bernie Tershy, Donald A Croll, Brad Keitt, Piero Genovesi, Ian J Burfield, David J Will, Alexander L Bond, Alex Wegmann, Alfonso Aguirre-Muñoz, André F Raine, Charles R Knapp, Chung-Hang Hung, David Wingate, Erin Hagen, Federico Méndez-Sánchez, Gerard Rocamora, Hsiao-Wei Yuan, Jakob Fric, James Millett, James Russell, Jill Liske-Clark, Eric Vidal, Hervé Jourdan, Karl Campbell, Keith Springer, Kirsty Swinnerton, Lolita Gibbons-Decherong, Olivier Langrand, M de L Brooke, Miguel McMinn, Nancy Bunbury, Nuno Oliveira, Paolo Sposimo, Pedro Geraldes, Pete McClelland, Peter Hodum, Peter G Ryan, Rafael Borroto-Páez, Ray Pierce, Richard Griffiths, Robert N Fisher, Ross Wanless, Stesha A Pasachnik, Steve Cranwell, Thierry Micol, Stuart H M Butchart |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 222 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 36 | 16% |
| United States | 13 | 6% |
| Spain | 12 | 5% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| South Africa | 5 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 107 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 72% |
| Scientists | 50 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 57 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 320. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#106,548
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,683
of 223,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,166
of 365,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#29
of 2,965 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,965 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.