↓ Skip to main content

Globally important islands where eradicating invasive mammals will benefit highly threatened vertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
241 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Globally important islands where eradicating invasive mammals will benefit highly threatened vertebrates
Published in
PLoS ONE, March 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0212128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick D. Holmes, Dena R. Spatz, Steffen Oppel, Bernie Tershy, Donald A. Croll, Brad Keitt, Piero Genovesi, Ian J. Burfield, David J. Will, Alexander L. Bond, Alex Wegmann, Alfonso Aguirre-Muñoz, André F. Raine, Charles R. Knapp, Chung-Hang Hung, David Wingate, Erin Hagen, Federico Méndez-Sánchez, Gerard Rocamora, Hsiao-Wei Yuan, Jakob Fric, James Millett, James Russell, Jill Liske-Clark, Eric Vidal, Hervé Jourdan, Karl Campbell, Keith Springer, Kirsty Swinnerton, Lolita Gibbons-Decherong, Olivier Langrand, M. de L. Brooke, Miguel McMinn, Nancy Bunbury, Nuno Oliveira, Paolo Sposimo, Pedro Geraldes, Pete McClelland, Peter Hodum, Peter G. Ryan, Rafael Borroto-Páez, Ray Pierce, Richard Griffiths, Robert N. Fisher, Ross Wanless, Stesha A. Pasachnik, Steve Cranwell, Thierry Micol, Stuart H. M. Butchart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 241 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 53%
Environmental Science 13 22%
Unspecified 12 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 332. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#34,564
of 13,510,831 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#749
of 143,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,175
of 255,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#8
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,510,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.