↓ Skip to main content

Kathryn Weedman Arthur: The Lives of Stone Tools: Crafting the Status, Skill, and Identity of Flintknappers

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kathryn Weedman Arthur: The Lives of Stone Tools: Crafting the Status, Skill, and Identity of Flintknappers
Published in
African Archaeological Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10437-019-09328-y
Authors

Diane Lyons

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#12,010,183
of 13,543,688 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#128
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,330
of 255,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,543,688 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.