You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Multiclade HIV-1 Adenoviral Vector Vaccine Alone or as Boost following a Multiclade HIV-1 DNA Vaccine in Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0012873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter Jaoko, Etienne Karita, Kayitesi Kayitenkore, Gloria Omosa-Manyonyi, Susan Allen, Soe Than, Elizabeth M. Adams, Barney S. Graham, Richard A. Koup, Robert T. Bailer, Carol Smith, Len Dally, Bashir Farah, Omu Anzala, Claude M. Muvunyi, Jean Bizimana, Tony Tarragona-Fiol, Philip J. Bergin, Peter Hayes, Martin Ho, Kelley Loughran, Wendy Komaroff, Gwynneth Stevens, Helen Thomson, Mark J. Boaz, Josephine H. Cox, Claudia Schmidt, Jill Gilmour, Gary J. Nabel, Patricia Fast, Job Bwayo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,587,641
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,527
of 197,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,056
of 97,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#503
of 916 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 916 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.