↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Cellulose Sulfate Vaginal Gel for the Prevention of HIV Infection: Results of a Phase III Trial in Nigeria

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Cellulose Sulfate Vaginal Gel for the Prevention of HIV Infection: Results of a Phase III Trial in Nigeria
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera Halpern, Folasade Ogunsola, Orikomaba Obunge, Chin-Hua Wang, Nneka Onyejepu, Oyinola Oduyebo, Doug Taylor, Linda McNeil, Neha Mehta, John Umo-Otong, Sakiru Otusanya, Tania Crucitti, Said Abdellati

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,587,641
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,527
of 197,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,555
of 167,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#247
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.