↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 416)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
149 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
Published in
Population Health Metrics, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrés Peralta, Joan Benach, Carme Borrell, Verónica Espinel-Flores, Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Bernardo L. Queiroz, Marc Marí-Dell’Olmo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#386,916
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#12
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,560
of 365,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them