↓ Skip to main content

Target product profiles for protecting against outdoor malaria transmission

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Target product profiles for protecting against outdoor malaria transmission
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerry F Killeen, Sarah J Moore

Abstract

Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual sprays (IRS) have decimated malaria transmission by killing indoor-feeding mosquitoes. However, complete elimination of malaria transmission with these proven methods is confounded by vectors that evade pesticide contact by feeding outdoors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Philippines 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 91 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 19%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 11 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#4,862,786
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,490
of 4,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,238
of 224,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#27
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.