You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mucosal Healing and Fibrosis after Acute or Chronic Inflammation in Wild Type FVB-N Mice and C57BL6 Procollagen α1(I)-Promoter-GFP Reporter Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0042568 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shengli Ding, Kristen L. W. Walton, Randall Eric Blue, Kirk MacNaughton, Scott T. Magness, Pauline Kay Lund |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 24% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,787,250
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,763
of 197,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,256
of 165,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#991
of 4,051 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,051 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.