↓ Skip to main content

Dialect on trial: use of African American Vernacular English influences juror appraisals

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology, Crime & Law, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Dialect on trial: use of African American Vernacular English influences juror appraisals
Published in
Psychology, Crime & Law, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/1068316x.2019.1597086
Authors

Courtney A. Kurinec, Charles A. Weaver

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,608,344
of 13,172,054 outputs
Outputs from Psychology, Crime & Law
#196
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,606
of 252,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology, Crime & Law
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,172,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.