You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coronavirus Papain-like Proteases Negatively Regulate Antiviral Innate Immune Response through Disruption of STING-Mediated Signaling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030802 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Sun, Yaling Xing, Xiaojuan Chen, Yang Zheng, Yudong Yang, Daniel B. Nichols, Mark A. Clementz, Bridget S. Banach, Kui Li, Susan C. Baker, Zhongbin Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 14% |
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 38 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 11% |
| Unknown | 54 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,377,938
of 24,127,822 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#143,462
of 207,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,032
of 254,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,017
of 3,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,127,822 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.