You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of the Aging Brain Transcriptome and Synaptic Regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003329 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick M. Loerch, Tao Lu, Kelly A. Dakin, James M. Vann, Adrian Isaacs, Chengiz Geula, Jianbin Wang, Ying Pan, Dana H. Gabuzda, Cheng Li, Tomas A. Prolla, Bruce A. Yankner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 313 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 24% |
| Researcher | 70 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 65 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 111 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 65 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 62 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,648,406
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,124
of 222,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,319
of 101,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#147
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.