↓ Skip to main content

Wadis as dryland river parks: challenges and opportunities in designing with hydro-ecological dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape Research, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Wadis as dryland river parks: challenges and opportunities in designing with hydro-ecological dynamics
Published in
Landscape Research, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/01426397.2019.1592132
Authors

Sareh Moosavi, Margaret J. Grose, Philip S. Lake

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 200%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,944,829
of 13,568,727 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Research
#182
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,249
of 256,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Research
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,568,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.