↓ Skip to main content

Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 5,379)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
130 X users
facebook
25 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function
Published in
European Spine Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00586-012-2155-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. F. Mannion, F. Caporaso, N. Pulkovski, H. Sprott

Abstract

Various studies have shown that spine stabilisation exercise therapy elicits improvements in symptoms/disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (cLBP). However, few have corroborated the intended mechanism of action by examining whether clinical improvements (1) are greater in patients with functional deficits of the targeted muscles and (2) correlate with post-treatment improvements in abdominal muscle function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 355 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 16%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Other 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Researcher 34 9%
Other 95 25%
Unknown 52 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 140 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 21%
Sports and Recreations 46 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 63 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#452,600
of 25,890,819 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#33
of 5,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,414
of 254,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,890,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.