You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-012-2155-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. F. Mannion, F. Caporaso, N. Pulkovski, H. Sprott |
| Abstract |
Various studies have shown that spine stabilisation exercise therapy elicits improvements in symptoms/disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (cLBP). However, few have corroborated the intended mechanism of action by examining whether clinical improvements (1) are greater in patients with functional deficits of the targeted muscles and (2) correlate with post-treatment improvements in abdominal muscle function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 12% |
| Australia | 8 | 6% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 112 | 86% |
| Scientists | 10 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 356 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 14% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 99 | 26% |
| Unknown | 54 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 46 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#450,024
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#33
of 5,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,403
of 253,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.