↓ Skip to main content

Chemical synthesis rewriting of a bacterial genome to achieve design flexibility and biological functionality

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Chemical synthesis rewriting of a bacterial genome to achieve design flexibility and biological functionality
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1818259116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan E. Venetz, Luca Del Medico, Alexander Wölfle, Philipp Schächle, Yves Bucher, Donat Appert, Flavia Tschan, Carlos E. Flores-Tinoco, Mariëlle van Kooten, Rym Guennoun, Samuel Deutsch, Matthias Christen, Beat Christen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 29%
Researcher 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 24%
Engineering 6 6%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 15 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#23,802
of 14,355,539 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#718
of 82,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#808
of 265,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#31
of 1,080 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,355,539 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,080 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.