↓ Skip to main content

Ocular Delivery of Compacted DNA-Nanoparticles Does Not Elicit Toxicity in the Mouse Retina

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ocular Delivery of Compacted DNA-Nanoparticles Does Not Elicit Toxicity in the Mouse Retina
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi-Qin Ding, Alexander B. Quiambao, J. Browning Fitzgerald, Mark J. Cooper, Shannon M. Conley, Muna I. Naash

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 15 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,588,614
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,527
of 197,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,694
of 94,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#270
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.