You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Importance of disulphide bonds for vaccinia virus L1R protein function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-2-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert E Blouch, Chelsea M Byrd, Dennis E Hruby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2010.
All research outputs
#7,623,423
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#919
of 3,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,075
of 150,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.