You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interprofessional safety reporting and review of adverse events and medication errors in critical care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s188185 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Chapuis, Sébastien Chanoine, Laurence Colombet, Silvia Calvino-Gunther, Caroline Tournegros, Nicolas Terzi, Pierrick Bedouch, Carole Schwebel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,100,333
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#664
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,342
of 364,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.