↓ Skip to main content

Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Joanne Dudeney, Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 443 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 16%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 8%
Other 93 21%
Unknown 98 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 25%
Psychology 80 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 14%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 120 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,095,010
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,852
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,378
of 276,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.