↓ Skip to main content

Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011118.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Fisher, Emily Law, Joanne Dudeney, Christopher Eccleston, Tonya M Palermo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 218 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 19 9%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 27 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 32%
Psychology 50 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 41 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#919,106
of 13,839,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,813
of 10,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,738
of 261,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,839,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.