↓ Skip to main content

Dietary fiber intake and glycemic control: coronary artery calcification in type 1 diabetes (CACTI) study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary fiber intake and glycemic control: coronary artery calcification in type 1 diabetes (CACTI) study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12937-019-0449-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arpita Basu, Amy C. Alman, Janet K. Snell-Bergeon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Unspecified 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Unspecified 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,733,450
of 21,200,954 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#445
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,819
of 287,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,200,954 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them