↓ Skip to main content

Granger Causality Analysis of Steady-State Electroencephalographic Signals during Propofol-Induced Anaesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Granger Causality Analysis of Steady-State Electroencephalographic Signals during Propofol-Induced Anaesthesia
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam B. Barrett, Michael Murphy, Marie-Aurélie Bruno, Quentin Noirhomme, Mélanie Boly, Steven Laureys, Anil K. Seth

Abstract

Changes in conscious level have been associated with changes in dynamical integration and segregation among distributed brain regions. Recent theoretical developments emphasize changes in directed functional (i.e., causal) connectivity as reflected in quantities such as 'integrated information' and 'causal density'. Here we develop and illustrate a rigorous methodology for assessing causal connectivity from electroencephalographic (EEG) signals using Granger causality (GC). Our method addresses the challenges of non-stationarity and bias by dividing data into short segments and applying permutation analysis. We apply the method to EEG data obtained from subjects undergoing propofol-induced anaesthesia, with signals source-localized to the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices. We found significant increases in bidirectional GC in most subjects during loss-of-consciousness, especially in the beta and gamma frequency ranges. Corroborating a previous analysis we also found increases in synchrony in these ranges; importantly, the Granger causality analysis showed higher inter-subject consistency than the synchrony analysis. Finally, we validate our method using simulated data generated from a model for which GC values can be analytically derived. In summary, our findings advance the methodology of Granger causality analysis of EEG data and carry implications for integrated information and causal density theories of consciousness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 4 2%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 220 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 26%
Researcher 58 23%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Professor 17 7%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 23 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 47 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 12%
Engineering 30 12%
Psychology 28 11%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 44 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2012.
All research outputs
#3,097,583
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40,709
of 193,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,793
of 243,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#471
of 3,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.