You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison in eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage among four limb muscles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-010-1648-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trevor C. Chen, Kun-Yi Lin, Hsin-Lian Chen, Ming-Ju Lin, Kazunori Nosaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 101 | 37% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,358,286
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,214
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,778
of 106,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.